Топологические аспекты триангулярных борных нанотрубок и альфа-борных нанотрубок

Образец цитирования: Hemavathi P. S., Lokesha V., Manjunath M., Reddy P. S. K.,  Shruti R.  Topological Aspects Boron Triangular Nanotube and  Boron-\(\alpha\) Nanotube // Владикавк. мат. журн. 2020. Т. 22,  № 1. С.66-77 (in English). DOI 10.23671/VNC.2020.1.57585

1. Fath-Tabar, M. Old and New Zagreb Indices of Graphs,
MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem., 2011, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 79-84.

2. Fajtlowicz, S. On Conjectures of Graffiti-II, Congr. Numer., 1987, vol. 60, pp. 187-197.

3. Furtula,  B. and Gutman,  I. A Forgotten Topological Index, J. Math. Chem., 2015, vol. 53, no. 4,  pp. 1184-1190. DOI: 10.1007/s10910-015-0480-z.

4. Balaban, A. T. Highly Discriminating Distance Based Numerical Descriptor, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1982, vol. 89, pp. 399-404. DOI:
10.1016/0009-2614(82)80009-2.

5. Das, K. C. and Gutman, I. Some Properties of the Second Zagreb Index, MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem., 2004, vol. 52, pp. 103-112.

6. Devillers, J. and  Balaban, A. T.  Topological Indices and Related Descriptors in QSAR and QSPR, Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, 1999.

7. Milicevic, A., Nikolic,  S. and Trinajstic, N. On Reformulated Zagreb Indices, Molecular Diversity, 2004, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 393-399. DOI:
10.1023/b:modi.0000047504.14261.2a.

8. Alexander,  V. Upper and Lower Bounds of  Symmetric Division deg Index,   Iran. J. Math. Chem., 2014, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 91-98.

9. Vukicevic, D. and Gasperov, M. Bond Additive Modeling 1. Adriatic Indices, Croat. Chem. Acta, 2010. vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 243-260.

10. Gupta, C. K., Lokesha, V., Shwetha, S. B. and Ranjini, P. S. On the Symmetric Division deg Index of Graph, Southeast Asian Bull. Math., 2016, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 59-80.

11. Kunstmann, J. and  Quandt, A. Broad Boron Sheets and Boron Nanotubes: Anab Initiostudy of Structural, Electronic,
and Mechanical Properties, Phys. Rev. B, 2006, vol. 74,
no. 3, pp. 1-14. DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.74.035413.

12. Battersby,  S. Boron Nanotubes Could Outperform Carbon. New
 Scientist. URL:  www.newscientist.com (accessed on 4 January 2008).

13. Miller, P. Boron Nanotubes Beat Carbon at its Own Game. Engadget. URL: www.engadget.com (accessed on 6 January 2008).

14. Lee, R. K .F., Cox,  B. J. and Hill, J. M. Ideal Polyhedral Model for Boron Nanotubes with Distinct Bond Lengths,    J. Phys. Chem. C., 2009, vol. 113, no. 46,    pp. 19794-19805. DOI: 10.1021/jp904985r.

15. Tang, H. and  Ismail-Beigi, S. Novel Precursors for Boron Nanotubes, the Competition of Two-center and Three-center Bonding in Boron Sheets, Phys. Rev. Lett., 2007, vol. 99, no. 11, pp. 115501-115504. DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.99.115501.

16. Manuel, P. Computational Aspects of Carbon and Boron Nanotubes,
 Molecules, 2010, vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 8709-8722. DOI:
 10.3390/molecules15128709.

17. Liu, J.-B., Shaker, H., Nadeem,  I. and Hussain, M. Topological Aspects of Boron Nanotubes, Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 2018,  pp. 1-11. DOI: 10.1155/2018/5729291.