The Geometer's Angle No. 7: On
the Triple Square and the Diagonal of the Golden Section |
Marcus
the Marinite 667
Miller Avenue
Mill Valley, California 94941 USA
It is better to have nothing than to possess much and impart
it to no one. Sextus the Pythagorean
INTRODUCTION Last issue's focus on the Golden Section
has stayed with me, and thinking back to all my work with this
ratio, I recall doing a construction regarding a particular "action
taken" on the ratio, 1.618
: 1. Let me explain what
I mean by, "action taken".[1] As an example, an action can be taken
on the golden section rectangle by rotating its long side to
its opposite long side to cut off the Öf
on that opposite side. This action generates both the Triangle
of Price[2]
and the Öf rectangle, which is
much different than the original golden section rectangle that
yielded it. There are only a couple of elements brought over
to the new grid. One primary similarity is the making of the
golden section ratio (the "golden cut") on both rectangles
as a result of a key element in the grid. In the golden section
rectangle, the side of the square cuts the long side of the rectangle
at the golden section. In the square root of the golden section
rectangle, the occult centers are at the golden sections of all
four sides. Most obvious is the fact that both rectangles have
the same short side length of 1.
Another action that can be taken with the rectangle is to
use its diameter length (here, in the golden section rectangle,
the length is 1.902
) to become the new length of the long
side of the new rectangle; it's ratio then being, 1.902
to 1 (1.902
:1 is the ratio for the American flag!). The
new system generated in the "1.902
" rectangle
is the "Triple Square", a system that "grew"
from the rotational action taken on the diagonal. (A similar
rotational action taken on diagonals of rectangles is the Square
Root Rectangle system.) In essence, the creative action of the
geometer's procedures transforms (we say morphs now) one geometric
system into a totally new one. It is totally unexpected because
there is no obvious external "formula" that would appear
to link the two. It was through the process of drawing and construction
that the metamorphosis took place.
Before we begin the drawing, we must first develop various portions
of the rectangle's anatomy:
- We will generate the triple square from the golden section
rectangle and its diagonal through the rectangle's transformation
into the "1. 902
: 1" ratio;
- We will be separating the rectangle into its two component
parts: the square and the (reciprocal) golden section rectangle.
- We will also do the diagonals and the reciprocal systems.
These become key elements in the transformation.
Here then, we proceed to the steps for our construction:
Proceed
to Step 1 | Go
to conclusion
NOTES [1] There can be infinite
actions taken on any and all geometric constructions, ratios,
and shapes that can and will transfer them from one geometric
system to another; this is to be discussed in a future column.
return to text
[2] A name given to the only right triangle whose three
sides are in a geometric progression: 1, Öf , Öf. See
also my article "A Comparative Geometric
Analysis of the Heights and Bases of the Great Pyramid of Khufu
and the Pyramid of the Sun at Teotihuacan" in the NNJ
vol. 1, no. 4 (October 1999). return to text
The correct citation
for this article is: Mark A. Reynolds, "On the
Triple Square and the Diagonal of the Golden Section", Nexus
Network Journal, vol. 4, no. 2 (Spring 2002), http://www.nexusjournal.com/GA-v4n2.html |
Copyright ©2005 Kim Williams
Books
top of
page |
NNJ Homepage
The Geometer's Angle Homepage
Comment on this article
Order
books!
Research
Articles
Didactics
Book
Reviews
Conference and Exhibit Reports
The Virtual Library
Submission Guidelines
Top
of Page |