The following result is proved: If
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/114fd/114fd70f0e9aeb8557c1a88dd239f2b8416b092b" alt="$A\subseteq \{
1,\, 2,\, \ldots ,\, n\} $"
is the subset of largest cardinality such
that the sum of no two (distinct) elements of
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/94e9f/94e9faa6be44a4e290af62cc5bb83808bfc9ca84" alt="$A$"
is prime, then
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cb6ef/cb6ef4e7f6091eab9ce715b233f7f1845df3ba23" alt="$\vert A\vert=\lfloor(n+1)/2\rfloor$"
and all the elements of
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/94e9f/94e9faa6be44a4e290af62cc5bb83808bfc9ca84" alt="$A$"
have the
same parity. The following open question is posed: what is the
largest cardinality of
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/114fd/114fd70f0e9aeb8557c1a88dd239f2b8416b092b" alt="$A\subseteq \{
1,\, 2,\, \ldots ,\, n\} $"
such that the sum of no two (distinct) elements of
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/94e9f/94e9faa6be44a4e290af62cc5bb83808bfc9ca84" alt="$A$"
is prime
and
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/94e9f/94e9faa6be44a4e290af62cc5bb83808bfc9ca84" alt="$A$"
contains elements of both parities?
Received April 16 2008;
revised version received December 13 2008.
Published in Journal of Integer Sequences, December 13 2008.