JOURNAL OF
ALGEBRAIC
COMBINATORICS

Home > Vol 17, No 3 (2003)

Robert G. Donnelly

Let be a complex semisimple Lie algebra with specified Chevalley generators. Let V be a finite dimensional representation of with weight basis . The supporting graph P of is defined to be the directed graph whose vertices are the elements of and whose colored edges describe the supports of the actions of the Chevalley generators on V. Four properties of weight bases are introduced in this setting, and several families of representations are shown to have weight bases which have or are conjectured to have each of the four properties. The basis can be determined to be edge-minimizing (respectively, edge-minimal) by comparing P to the supporting graphs of other weight bases of V. The basis is solitary if it is the only basis (up to scalar changes) which has P as its supporting graph. The basis is a modular lattice basis if P is the Hasse diagram of a modular lattice. The Gelfand-Tsetlin bases for the irreducible representations of sl( n, ) serve as the prototypes for the weight bases sought in this paper. These bases, as well as weight bases for the fundamental representations of sp(2 n, ) and the irreducible one-dimensional weight space representations of any semisimple Lie algebra, are shown to be solitary and edge-minimal and to have modular lattice supports. Tools developed here are used to construct uniformly the irreducible one-dimensional weight space representations. Similar results for certain irreducible representations of the odd orthogonal Lie algebra o(2 n + 1, ), the exceptional Lie algebra G ₂, and for the adjoint and short adjoint representations of the simple Lie algebras are announced.

1. C. De Concini, “Symplectic standard tableaux,” Adv. Math. 34 (1979), 1-27.
2. R.G. Donnelly, “Symplectic analogs of L(m, n),” J. Comb. Th. Series A 88 (1999), 217-234.
3. R.G. Donnelly, “Explicit constructions of the fundamental representations of the symplectic Lie algebras,” J. Algebra, 233 (2000), 37-64.
4. R.G. Donnelly, “Extremal bases for the adjoint representations of the simple Lie algebras,” preprint.
5. R.G. Donnelly, “Explicit constructions of the fundamental representations of the odd orthogonal Lie algebras,” preprint.
6. R.G. Donnelly, S.J. Lewis, and R. Pervine, “Constructions of representations of o(2n +1, C) that imply Molev and Reiner-Stanton lattices are strongly Sperner,” Discrete Math. 263 (2003), 61-79.
7. I.M. Gelfand and M.L. Tsetlin, “Finite-dimensional representations of the group of unimodular matrices,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk. USSR 71 (1950), 825-828 (Russian).
8. R. Howe, “Perspectives on Invariant Theory,” The Schur Lectures (1992), Israel Math. Conf. Proc., Bar-Ilan University, 1995, Vol. 8, pp. 1-182.
9. J.E. Humphreys, Introduction to Lie Algebras and Representation Theory, Springer, New York, 1972.
10. J.C. Jantzen, Lectures on Quantum Groups, Graduate Studies in Mathematics, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1996, Vol. 6.
11. M. Kashiwara, T. Miwa, J.-U.H. Petersen, and C.M. Yung, “Perfect crystals and q-deformed Fock Spaces,” Selecta Mathematica 2 (1996), 415-499.
12. M. Kashiwara and T. Nakashima, “Crystal graphs for representations of the q-analogue of classical Lie algebras,” J. Algebra 165 (1994), 295-345. DONNELLY
13. P. Littelmann, “A generalization of the Littlewood-Richardson rule,” J. Algebra 130 (1990), 328-336.
14. A. Molev, “A basis for representations of symplectic Lie algebras,” Comm. Math. Phys. 201 (1999), 591-618.
15. A. Molev, “A weight basis for representations of even orthogonal Lie algebras,” in “Combinatorial Methods in Representation Theory,” Adv. Studies in Pure Math. 28 (2000), 221-240.
16. A. Molev, “Weight bases of Gelfand-Tsetlin type for representations of classical Lie algebras,” J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 33 (2000), 4143-4168.
17. R.A. Proctor, “Representations of sl(2, C) on posets and the Sperner property,” SIAM J. Alg. Disc. Meth. 3 (1982), 275-280.
18. R.A. Proctor, “Bruhat lattices, plane partition generating functions, and minuscule representations,” Europ. J. Combin. 5 (1984), 331-350.
19. R.A. Proctor, “Solution of a Sperner conjecture of Stanley with a construction of Gelfand,” J. Comb. Th. A 54 (1990), 225-234.
20. V. Reiner and D. Stanton, “Unimodality of differences of specialized Schur functions,” J. Algebraic Comb. 7 (1998), 91-107.
21. J.T. Sheats, “A symplectic jeu de taquin bijection between the tableaux of King and of De Concini,” Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 351 (1999), 3569-3607.
22. R.P. Stanley, Enumerative Combinatorics, Wadsworth and Brooks/Cole, Monterey, CA, 1986, Vol. 1.
23. R.P. Stanley, Enumerative Combinatorics, Cambridge University Press, 1999, Vol. 2.
24. J.R. Stembridge, “Multiplicity-free products and restrictions of Weyl characters,” preprint.
25. N.J. Wildberger, “A combinatorial construction for simply-laced Lie algebras,” preprint.